25th Jul2012

Movie Review: The Dark Knight Rises

by Jeremy

Movie Poster for the Dark Knight Rises

Normally I don’t include spoilers in my reviews, because I write the reviews to give people an idea of why they would or wouldn’t want to watch the movie. In this case, my thoughts on the movie have a lot to do with the plot, theme and characters, so…

THERE ARE SPOILERS, BEWARE!

It has taken me some time to get all of my thoughts on this movie into a post. I am a huge Batman fan. Huge. Comic books, movies, video games, tv shows, I’ve seen it all. I have always loved Batman because even though he was human, he’s always stood shoulder to shoulder with gods. He’s the symbol of physical and mental (and financial) human perfection. So, when I say that I wanted to love this movie, believe that I was ready to fan-boy out for it. I went to the Batman Movie Marathon at my local theater and enjoyed seeing the earlier Nolan-Batman movies again on the big screen. I enjoyed spending my time in between the movies correcting the people who said things like: “Nolan said there would be lots of Batmen in this one”, or “in the comics Bane is friends with Poison Ivy”. Please never let me hear you say that again, you’re confusing the Schumacher Batman & Robin with the comics and I can’t just stand here and let you do that. Maybe watching the new movie right after The Dark Knight was a horrible idea. That movie still stands as the best Batman movie ever, in my opinion. While I didn’t love The Dark Knight Rises, there were plenty of parts I liked, enough to make me want to see it again.

Let’s start with what I did like: the characters. Not just how they were written for this movie, but as they relate to their comic book counter parts. Nolan did another great job of taking fantasy characters, and sculpting them into nearly believable reality. Bane is a great example. Sure, they could have had him on an “experimental drug” and CGI’d him into a big cartoon monster. Instead they just took a massive Tom Hardy and had him be so much more than masked muscle.  In fact I feel like we only ever noticed how huge he was, when we were directed to by well placed camera angles, or shots of him without much of a shirt on. In the comic books, Bane was the perfect anti-Batman, born in a prison (see what they did there), he was both a strategic mastermind as well as a powerhouse. He wore down Batman mentally and physically before finally breaking his back over his knee. An iconic scene we were allowed to witness in the The Dark Knight Returns. 

Marion Cotillard’s Talia was another dead-on adaptation from the comic books. She was correct parts intelligent and deadly. She pulled the strings in the background, only revealing herself for what she was, when she stepped up and stabbed her enemy in the back. If you’ll remember, this is Ra’s Al Ghul’s advice in Batman Begins.

I remember an interview after Batman Begins came out, in which Christopher Nolan swears he would never have a Robin in his Batman movies. I believe there was a similar statement from Christian Bale, somewhere along the lines of never wanting to be in a Batman movie with a Robin. Well, I am glad they changed their minds. Joseph Gordon Levitt did a wonderful job as Jon Blake. A lot of people have called him an amalgam of the Robins from the comic books, I don’t totally see that. Dick Grayson (the original Robin) was a Gotham City Police Officer for a while after he grew up. Tim Drake (third Robin) was the Robin that figured out who Batman was, all on his own, when he was only a kid. For this movie, whatever his name was, he was the perfect sidekick for Batman. He helped out when he could and he helped Batman gain some perspective. At the end, he even “re-discovered” the Batcave, allowing for a chance to tell new stories with a new Batman (Newsarama talks about that more here). They did such a good job of making me believe that Jon Blake was Batman’s sidekick, when we find out that his real first name is Robin, it’s as though Nolan is sitting beside me at the theater, poking me in the side saying: “He’s Robin, get it? Get it? Do ya get it?”

Yes I got it, we all got it.

I’m so glad that he didn’t do the same thing with Anne Hathaway’s Selina Kyle. Another nearly “purrfect” adaptation. Nolan made her a sympathetic character in the same way the comic books portray her. A thief who reluctantly does the right thing. Even when she’s trying to be a greedy burglar, Catwoman is often committing crimes to help someone. In the case of the movie she’s trying for a clean slate, not a completely altruistic goal, but in the end she comes through and proves she’s not just in it for the money. Anne Hathaway also proves she wasn’t just thrown into this movie for star power, but because she can play a believable Batman/Bruce Wayne love interest. Maybe if her life isn’t completely straightened out, we could get her in a proper Catwoman spin-off movie. Speaking of characters with depth, Gary Oldman’s Commissioner Gordon is second only to Batman when it comes to character development. Just as we’ve seen Bruce Wayne grow into the man he was meant to become, so have we seen James Gordon rise from Sargent to Leiutenant, then finally Commissioner. Gordon has always been us, the reader, the audience, the viewer. We’re just normal people, we want to do what is right, but we don’t have the power or the means, just the will. When we discover that he is upset with living the lie about what has really happened with Harvey Dent and Batman, it just solidifies his humanity. Who wouldn’t be unhappy with the circumstances? However, by the end of the movie he no longer seems to be weighed down with that guilt. It is as though when Bane read his speech aloud to Gotham City, he no longer felt burdened by it. Which is all fine and good, but I don’t think it offered the same kind of closure for the audience.

Batman. Christian Bale turns in his last performance as Bruce Wayne, and I just wasn’t feeling it. Batman is not a quitter. Of course, if what is best for Gotham City is to not have a Batman, then he would step down. But, the comic book Bruce Wayne would never stop training, never stop preparing for that day when his city might need him once again. He also wouldn’t need to be convinced when it was time to come back. In the comic books, Bruce Wayne (almost) always knows what is best for Gotham. That’s one of the biggest differences between the comic and Nolan-movie versions of Batman. In the movies, Bruce was always striving for a world that didn’t need him anymore. He has to be, it makes him more human, and makes way for a happy ending that he will never get in the continuous world of the comic books.

Finally, let’s look at where I really had trouble loving this movie. It is based in a time that is extremely similar to our current time. The economy is so bad, even Wayne Enterprises is losing money. Police Commissioner Gordon (and all of Gotham City) is living a lie, but they trek forward in content ignorance. Yet underneath this happiness, there is such discontent, that a man is able to raise an army of poor and disenfranchised, (dare I say blue-collar?) with promises of a city they control. Not run by greedy corporations, “Wallstreet” or politics; that they feel do not represent them. Hitting a little close to home yet? Sound a little like a certain crowd that wanted to “occupy” something? When this man’s plan finally comes together, the horribly mistreated rich, corporate heads, and other establishment figures are saved by Batman.

Wait? What?!?

Whose side am I supposed to be on? Just to make sure that we know who the bad guy is, Nolan gives Bane a nuclear ‘weapon’. Also, try not to think about the fact that the bomb is made out of an idealist, renewable, free energy source that would put Big Oil and Coal out of business. In the end, the status quo is retained, Batman rides off into the sunset AND gets the girl. Maybe that ending made you forget that Batman just spent two hours appearing to champion the wrong people. I am not saying let’s get a militia together, or that I hate rich people, or trying to be too political in anyway. Maybe, Nolan is being much more tongue-in-cheek than we realized. Maybe, his opinion is justice doesn’t care about poverty: if you stole because your family was starving. Maybe he’s saying that justice is black and white.

I’ve been told by many people to “lighten up”. But the themes still sit wrong with me. This movie wasn’t written in a vacuum. Christopher Nolan is aware of the political and economic climate. This moved may have worked better in the 1980′s and early 1990′s when change was not talked about, asked for, and protested in the name of, on a daily basis.

I plan on seeing the movie again, sometime this week. The fight scenes delivered and I loved hearing Bane’s crazy, almost comical voice. Maybe, after another viewing I can not take some things so seriously. This is just a movie, after all. Do you think I’m overreacting? Reading way too much into it? Or do you agree? Let me know in the comments below (or hit me up on Twitter), I’d really love to discuss this, especially if I missed something that would help me enjoy this movie more, the next time I view it.

14th Jul2012

Neil Gaiman To Write Sandman Prequel for Vertigo Comics

by Jeremy

Neil Gaiman's Sandman

Among all the great stuff being announced at San Diego Comic Con 2012, my favorite so far is the fact that author, Neil Gaiman (Sandman, Star Dust, Coraline, Anansi Boys) is returning to the character that made him popular (at least in the comic book world). At the Vertigo panel he announced that after 25 years, a new mini series about the Lord of Dreams would be available November of 2013. The prequel will tell the story of what Morpheus was doing before being captured in the first issue of Sandman.

Here’s the video where Gaiman announced the project:

When I watched that video, I was on the edge of my seat. I am a huge fan of the Sandman series, and I’m starting to get caught up on Gaiman’s novels as well. He brings the same kind of detail and poetry to his prose work that he does in the dialog of his comic books. He also mentioned that his artist would be J.H. Williams III, who is now co-authoring and drawing Batwoman (the Vol. 1 collection: Hydrology was on the New York Times best seller graphic novels list). Williams’ art is THE reason I originally started buying the Batwoman books, so I see this partnership as an All-Star lineup.

If you’re not familiar with the Sandman series (from Wikipedia):

“The Sandman’s main character is Dream, the Lord of Dreams (also known, to various characters throughout the series as Morpheus, Oneiros,…) who is essentially the anthropomorphic personification of dreams. At the start of the series, Morpheus is captured by an occult ritual and held prisoner for 70 years. Morpheus escapes in the modern day and, after avenging himself upon his captors, sets about rebuilding his kingdom, which has fallen into disrepair in his absence. Gaiman himself has summarized the plot of the series (in the foreword to Endless Nights) as ‘The Lord of Dreams learns that one must change or die, and makes his decision.’ “

I know some people will say that DC/Vertigo is just returning to an old property to make money like they did with Before Watchmen. Well, they might be right. The Before Watchmen books are top-selling, and the issues I have collected have been well made. On the other hand, Neil Gaiman has made plenty of money, and seems like the kind of artist who doesn’t have to return to a character unless he has a new story to tell.

If you would like to get familiar the Sandman series you can pick up the paperback collection: Sandman Slipcase Set. It comes out in November and gives you almost a whole year to read up before the new books come out. You should check out J.H. Williams Batwoman as well. You can go with the previously mentioned first New 52 Volume:Batwoman Vol. 1: Hydrology (The New 52), or go with the first collection of Batwoman in Detective Comics: Batwoman: Elegy, when she was written by Greg Rucka (J.H. Williams III is still the artist). This is the one I recommend, it’s what got me hooked.

Can you wait a whole year? More than a year, actually. I guess I’ll have to reread all my Sandman and Endless books while I wait for Gaiman’s next classic.

19th Jun2012

10 Things To Know About DC Comics Zero Month

by Jeremy

DC Comics "New 52" Justice League

If you are a reader of DC Comic’s New 52 and you’ve been following along and slowly putting together which parts of previous comic book continuity still apply and which parts of have been thrown out (example: Batman still had 3 previous Robins, but now Bruce is younger, so how long they all worked with him is unknown), then you will be interested in “Zero Month”. When DC recently released their preview for the comics that would be coming out in September, they announced that all of the New 52 comics would be a #0 issue, that is, an origin issue.

In a couple of instances, new titles will be spun off of their #0 issue. In other cases, they’ve connected books to feature more details. I read through all the solicits for you and picked out what I thought was most interesting.

Here’s My “10 Things to Know About DC Comics #0 Month”

1. Four New Titles! Talon #0 will feature Calvin Rose, the only Talon to escape the Court of Owls. This ties into the current storyline running in the Batman Family comic books. It is written by Scott Snyder, who has been writing (very well!) the current volume of Batman books. I’m a fan of his, so I might be picking this one up. Phantom Stranger, Sword of Sorcery and Team 7 will also be new ongoing’s after their origin issues.

2. Shazam’s Origin! Justice League #0 will be the (former Captain Marvel) New Shazam’s origin story, as well as the origin of Pandora. She’s the purple hooded woman who ushered in the New 52 after Flashpoint.

3. Superman Begins! Action Comics #0 will be Grant Morrison’s story of Clark Kent’s early days in Metropolis.

4. Krypton’s Back Story! Superman #0 is the story of how Jor-El (Superman’s dad…the one who sent him to Earth as a baby in a rocket ship) learned of Krypton’s impending destruction. Both of those books are straying away from just retelling Superman’s origin for the 100th time (not really 100, but still).

5. Building Batman Inc! Batman Inc. #0 retells the story of how Batman recruited the major players for his “war” with Leviathan. I feel like we already read that…last year…in Batman Inc. Vol. 1. They must be planning on changing things if they feel they need to revisit that.

6. Batman Begins 52 Style! Batman #0 picks up with Bruce Wayne returning from his journeys and beginning his vigilante career. They’re going to reveal how he assembled his headquarters, his vehicles and his gadgets.

7Bat-Geeks rejoice! Detective Comics #0 will be about young Bruce learning to master martial arts and introduce a villain.

8. Batman’s Origin! Batman: The Dark Knight #0 will be introducing us to the Wayne’s murderer, Joe Chill as Batman tries to figure out who murdered his parents.

9. Why is Jason Todd Alive Now?? Red Hood and the Outlaws #0 will be about how Jason Todd came back to life after being killed by the Joker. Hopefully we get something better than Superboy punching the walls of reality. Personally, I hope it is close to the Red Hood animated movie, it was a pretty well written story.

10. Cancelled Books! Okay, so the exclamation point isn’t needed here, but look on the bright side: If you are collecting Captain Atom, Resurrection Man or Voodoo, you will now have some extra month every month.

There, I did my job (I was a geek so you didn’t have to be) and sifted through over 52 solicits to bring you the good parts. Now do your part, tell me what you’re picking up from DC’s “Zero Month”. (If you want to look through the new previews yourself, head over to DC’s blog and find them)

[Edit 07/14/12]: I just found out that they are going to be collecting all the DC Issue Zero comics into one hardback book. You can pre order it here: DC Comics: The New 52 Zero (The New 52)

 

 

 

10th Apr2012

Batman: Arkham Unhinged #1

by Jeremy

 

the cover to Batman Arkham Unhinged #1

Did you love Batman Arkham City? Did you blast through the storyline? Collect all the collectables? Unlock all the unlockables? If you just can’t get enough of the latest award-winning Batman video game, then you should probably pick up Batman: Arkham Unhinged. It’s a prequel to the video game, and goes into the roles of the heroes and villains. According to DC Comics the comic book is:

A prequel to the game created with the developer, Rocksteady, this first issue features content previously available only as a digital released and explores the Catwoman/Two-Face rivalry and how it leads them into the clutches of Hugo Strange.

I did love the game, I did like the story line. With so many Batman books out now (five), I’m not sure if I’m ready to add another one that was created with the company that also created the video game. DC already has a lot of competition for any of my extra money with so many great indie books being released. I feel like if they had some bigger names involved (Paul Dini, for instance… he did help with the video game story line right?) with the creation, this Batman comic book would distinguish itself from just another chance for the video game to get some extra exposure, and make some more money.

Unless I read an outstanding review somewhere, I’m probably going to pass on this one. If you decide you want to pick it up, and for some reason you don’t know where your local comic book shop is, just click on this: Batman: Arkham Unhinged #1 and let Amazon.com do the work.

07th Feb2012

Your Misplaced ‘Before Watchmen’ Anger

by Jeremy

DC Comics' Before Watchmen: Ozymandias cover

DC Comics’ big news last week was that they’ll be going forward with plans for a Watchmen prequel. It has a lot of people up in arms about whether or not the company should write new stories for the 26-year-old comic book. I think I offer three different view points that will leave everyone a little upset with me. I can live that. Some people are saying DC should leave the masterpiece alone, and that they have no right to do add to it. In reality, DC Comics has every right to do whatever they want to the properties they own. Kill Superman? No problem. Restart every comic book in the shared universe at issue #1? Why not. I have seen many responses to this situation, mostly from other bloggers and fans, even a few from people in the comic book industry: they don’t seem too pleased at all with this.

From a fan’s point of view I can see why you don’t want anymore Watchmen comic books. Wait, no I can’t. When a sequel to a movie comes out we go and see it, even though we know that historically sequels are never as good as the original. Is it impossible to believe that these, already deep characters, cannot be given further depth? I am a huge Alan Moore fan, I am such a fanboy as to believe every time he touches his crazy, anarchist pen (or whatever he uses, sharpened, burnt wood?) to paper, eventually someone will make a movie out of it. But (and I DO NOT begin sentences with conjunctions often) I love other Batman stories after The Killing Joke. In fact, the last six years of Grant Morrison’s run, and now Scott Snyder’s have been incredible. Maybe in the 90′s when comic books were still in that weird adolescent-like phase of gore, ultra-violence and over the top musculature, I would have said, I don’t think the atmosphere is right for some more smart, but entertaining Watchmen comics. We’re past that time now. Comics now can have a thoughtful plot and still appeal to their core audience; even the mainstreamers like Superman, Batman and Spiderman. I believe we should give the current writers a chance, before completely ostracizing them.

From the original artist’s point of view, there is hesitance, even anger at watching someone else take over a story that was all yours. No one is changing the original Watchmen story. They are just giving fans an oppurtunity to enjoy some characters that they loved in new scenarios, new adventures, and new development. The Comedian was a bitter, punk before he got to Vietnam, why? Where did the Nite Owl get all his wonderful toys? What in the world made the United States vote for Nixon over and over and over? I do understand that Moore created these characters, but he did not own the copyright. Even then, he had to know that comic book death was reversible at the whim of the sales figures. So yes, his fury is comprehensible, even though he seems furious at most things these days.

Finally, let’s look at why this really makes sense. The comic book industry, is an industry. It is here to make money, and that money is used (in part) to make more comic books. DC Comics, in wanting to continue the repetitive cycle of making both money and comics, has decided that a good way to do this is by “cashing in” on a property of theirs that hasn’t been explored outside of twelve comic books, and a feature film. All of which have been hugely popular. From the business side, it would probably be a poor decision not to do it.

All of this is easy enough to speculate on, because we haven’t seen or read the books yet. A year from now, I may be changing my name and mailing address, as my fellow fanboys and bloggers (and children) disown me and pelt me with rotten vegetables (like the person who decided to put nipples on George Clooney’s Batsuit). At the same time, to the people who are so outraged: Are you not going to give any of these books a chance? Can you sit by week-after-week and not pick one of them up from your local comic book shop, and possibly miss out on all new stories of these classic characters? I’ll judge the book by its content.

31st Dec2011

My Top 5 Non-Geek Moments of 2011

by Jeremy

At the end of every year, it is always common to see various “top ten” or “greatest ‘x’ of the year” lists. Well, this is a little different, it is my list of:

The Top 5 Non-Geek Moments of 2011

5. The Tevatron Particle Accelerator at FermiLab shuts down

On September 30th, the 2nd largest particle accelerator in the world shuts down, mostly due to lack of federal funding, but also because the Large Hadron Collider in Europe has pulled a lot of the university research projects that had been staples of the Tevatron (specifically the majority of Higgs boson research). While FermiLab still has other projects to keep it active, it kind of emphasizes the attitude America has towards science, and the fact that we are no longer the world leader in these kind of things.

4. I Start Going Back to the Gym

Okay, seriously, I don’t want to be old, broke, bald AND fat. What did you expect. Don’t worry, it is not like I’m going to show up to a Comic Convention with a six-pack. Even though I would look amazing in spandex.

3. The End of NASA’s Space Shuttle Program

Not a good year for science in this country. Once again, government budget cuts and aging technology take another victim. This time, our beloved reusable space transportation. Luckily, companies like Virgin Galactic and SpaceX are doing their best to have their designs replace the shuttle.

2. DC Comics ReNumber and ReBoot (Nearly) EVERYTHING

This could probably be called one of the best things to happen, especially since the new directions and art teams are putting together some great and compelling books. DC’s market shares and sales numbers also reinforce that this was a great idea. For those of us that love our characters, but also are big collectors, the renumbering of books that have gone on uninterrupted for over 75 years (ahem, Detective Comics), is sort of frustrating.

1. Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 1

Another movie? Does Part 1 mean that there is another part? Let’s forget that the books are horribly written, fluff with no real soul. The ideas in this “saga” fly in the face of everything vampires are. They don’t go in the sun because they will sparkle? They knock up teenagers? I understand how it fits into the whole Kardashians/Jersey Shore/Teen Mom media world that is becoming the norm. As Geeks, we shouldn’t forget how literature’s vampires really are: however Anne Rice said they were.

I feel like 2012 has to be better; considering that a certain amazing double trilogy will be re-released in theaters, in 3D, beginning February 10th.